SITHHC/000-003

May 25, 2014

The SITHHC Commission has received in good order the following complaints from the listed plaintiffs. Upon request by the plaintiffs the following publication shall serve as the initial template for further investigations by the SITHHC Commission and shall be made available or forwarded internationally to those persons, institutions and communities who request so in support of their efforts to organize court or tribunal hearings in their respective nation(s).

This publication is not the effective case to be laid before the Tribunal. This publication is a public notification that the complaints have been received by the SITHHC and its Commission.

The plaintiffs can still add additional evidence, documents and information up until the SITHHC Commission has concluded its investigations, after which it shall lay the complaints and its investigations before the Tribunal.

The complaints and the SITHHC Commission’s investigations shall be laid before the Tribunal not later than May 25, 2015.

Number of exhibits: 116


PDF format


Case:

SITHHC/000-003: The People vs Bilderberg Meetings

In the Matters of:

Crimes against humanity; crimes against specific groups of citizens; crimes against peace; brigandage; war crimes; government-sponsored, government-supported, government-tolerated conspiracies, terrorism; psychological warfare; fraudulent financial operations.

Plaintiffs:

The people, Round-op Alpha Internal Justice Office, World Internet Union, SITHHC Initial Representatives

Defendants:

Stichting Bilderberg Meetings, Stichting Bilderberg Meetings Nederland, Virtual Building BV (The Netherlands), Connect Holland BV (The Netherlands), Chateau Du Lac (Belgium), Stenungsbaden (Sweden), Westfields Marriott Hotel (Chantilly, VA), Trianon Palace Versailles (France), Grand Hotel des Iles Borromees (Italy), Seehotel Überfahrt (Germany), Brookstreet Hotel (Canada), Ritz Carlton Hotel (Turkey), Astir Palace (Greece), Dolce Sitges (Spain), Suvretta House (Switzerland), The Grove Hertfordshire (UK), Marriott Hotel Copenhagen (Denmark), Hotel De Bilderberg (The Netherlands), Mr M.J. Meijer c.s (The Netherlands), VNO-NCW (The Netherlands, Belgium), American Friends of Bilderberg inc. (USA), The Bilderberg Association (UK), government of Vatican City State, CNC – Communications & Network Consulting (Germany), Publicis Groupe (France).


On this twenty-fifth day of May, 2014, the people – as internationally represented by themselves through subscription to and thereby the recognition of case “SITHHC/000-003,” the World Internet Union, the Round-op Alpha Internal Justice Office, the SITHHC Initial Representatives – lay before the SITHHC Commission the following evidence, documentation and indications relating to the documented intentions of the Bilderberg Meetings (a.k.a. Bilderberg Group), its Management Committees, its Steering Committee, its members and attendees to further expand and strengthen a corporative world governance cartel which, as documented, serves the purposes of consolidating political and economic power, natural and intellectual resources; which intentionally and solely benefits the establishing entities (the defendants) and their accomplices while impoverishing and enslaving the people – thus intentionally victimizing the people – and to secure continuing political/diplomatic/economic immunity for the establishing entities (the defendants) and their accomplices against any prosecutions in any courts of law for crimes against humanity; crimes against specific groups of citizens; crimes against peace; brigandage; war crimes; government-sponsored, government-supported, government-tolerated conspiracies, terrorism; psychological warfare; fraudulent financial operations – in the present and the future.

We the people who have filed and subscribe to case “SITHHC/000-003” lay before the SITHHC Commission also the following evidence, documentation and indications relating to crimes against humanity; crimes against specific groups of citizens; crimes against peace; brigandage; war crimes; government-sponsored, government-supported, government-tolerated conspiracies, terrorism; psychological warfare; fraudulent financial operations committed, orchestrated, executed, supported by the defendants and their accomplices.

In addition, we the people who have filed and subscribe to case “SITHHC/000-003” declare that all information provided in this filing and publication is available in the public domain, (several years) prior to this filing and publication. The information herein included can therefore not be disregarded nor dismissed in nor by the court(s) or tribunal(s) that shall hear and accept our case on the anticipated grounds that investigations have been obstructed or corrupted, as anticipated to be claimed by the defendants and there representations, since the information is already considered public domain upon filing and publication and thus has been available for consultation by any natural and legal person at any moment in time prior to the filing of case “SITHHC/000-003.

Furthermore, given the extent and exceptional nature of our case and considering the involvement of high-profile and high-level individuals on the side of the defendants, we the people who have filed and subscribe to case “SITHHC/000-003” are left with no other alternative or choice than to organize our case in this public manner. For it is declared by us that none of the existing by the international community recognized (international/national) judicial entities and venues are capable of serving our rights to justice – based upon filed case “SITHHC/000-001: The People vs National Governments and Intergovernmental Institutions” of May 21, 2014 – thus by which those judicial entities and venues can not serve justice in a fair, just and non-compromised manner.

The information provided in this filing and publication is hereby made available to any and all parties concerning case “SITHHC/000-003.” It is thus requested that all parties and any and all natural and legal persons who have interests in case “SITHHC/000-003,” have the means or will to participate in case “SITHHC/000-003” initiate the proper actions adequately in order to reach a just verdict as soon as possible and without any intentional delays.


CHAPTER I

OFFICIAL REGISTRATION

A. THE NETHERLANDS

Bilderberg is a registered foundation based in the Netherlands. According to the latest details provided by the Dutch government website kvk.nl (May 24, 2014) there are two subsidiaries, two foundations, that make up the actual Bilderberg as it is known by the general public.

One subsidiary is registered as:

  • Stichting Bilderberg Meetings Nederland: registration number (KvK) 41152933, located at Keizersgracht 695-699 Amsterdam, The Netherlands

The other subsidiary is registered as:

  • Stichting Bilderberg Meetings: registration number (KvK) 41210183, located at Keizersgracht 695-699 Amsterdam, The Netherlands

The address for both subsidiaries, foundations, is the same as the address for the notarial firm “Mr M.J. Meijer c.s” specialized in corporate law, real estate and private & family law. According to notarial firm Mr M.J. Meijer c.s their notarial practice has been based at this Dutch Keizersgracht address since 1909 and currently includes 4 active civil-law notaries.

Up to 13 companies or foundations are registered at Keizersgracht 695-699 in Amsterdam.

Earlier, in 2011, the Dutch press, ‘Leidsch Dagblad,’  reported that the Bilderberg headquarters had recently been smirched with signs displaying “NO NWO.” Apparently Bilderberg was then registered in the Meren quarter of Leiden, 30 km south of Amterdam.

Aside from the infamous international Bilderberg conferences, annually held in a different country, there are also annual Bilderberg conferences that focus more on The Netherlands but also the EU is of course always high on the agenda, held in the Bilderberg Hotel Oosterbeek in the Netherlands and organized by VNO-NCW which is the biggest corporate lobby organization of The Netherlands. VNO-NCW’s main offices are located in The Hague and they have additional offices in Brussels where they lobby at the European Union.

Among many others, these meetings are also attended by figures like Dutch minister of Finance Jeroen Dijsselbloem, KLM Airlines president Peter Hartman, Unilever CEO Paul Polman, EU Council president Herman van Rompuy, Dutch minister Maxime Verhagen, former Belgian prime minister Guy Verhofstadt, former Dutch vice-prime minister Wouter Bos and Dutch roman catholic bishop Adrianus van Luyn.

This year, 2014, the 52nd edition of these Bilderberg conferences in The Netherlands was held on Februay 7 and 8. The next meeting, in 2015, is set to take place on February 6 and 7. The digital invitations will be sent in December of 2014.

B. UNITED KINGDOM

Bilderberg, in addition to its Dutch subsidiaries (foundations), also has a subsidiary (foundation) in the United Kingdom, registered as “The Bilderberg Association.” The UK subsidiary “makes annual contributions towards … a small secretariat (Bilderberg Meetings) based in the Netherlands” that “carries out the administration for the International Steering Committee and the publication of the meetings’ reports.The association is not required to make a contribution towards the cost of the secretariat in the year in which the conference is held in the UK. The hospitality costs of the annual meetings are the responsibility of the Steering Committee member of the host country. The association provides funds for the conferences when they are held in the UK. Funds are also provided for the travel costs of some UK participants to attend the meetings.”

Officially the objectives of Bilderberg’s UK foundation also include: “to promote the study of, and public education in international affairs, economics and the social sciences with reference in particular to political, economic and social problems affecting the democratic countries of North America and Western Europe and the effects of industrialisation upon the social structures and environments of such countries.

In 2011 and 2012, The Bilderberg Association received £50,000 in donations each year from individual Management Committee members. No specific “Management Committee,” or members thereof, was listed. However, according to The Bilderberg Association’s annual accounts “the association is managed by a committee of not more than three but no less than two people,” so Kenneth Clarke QC (entangled in Jimmy Savile’s pedophilia and caught up in council tax ‘flips’), MP Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (executive at Rio Tinto during their espionage and bribery case) and Marcus Agius – listed as Committee Members – each donated £16,666.67 in 2011 and £16,666.67 in 2012. In 2013, £50,000 “were received from one of the individual Management Committee members.”

One can rightfully ask why a person would donate such a big amount of money to an alleged charitable organization such as The Bilderberg Association when that organization doesn’t do anything charitable in any way, except for covering the expenses of rich people who congregate in secret. Charity for the extremely wealthy individuals of the international community? Indeed absurd!

In addition, the high amounts that are being donated by the Committee Members further strongly suggest that the donors anticipate certain favors in return for their monetary contribution, favors such as aiding and abetting in relation to the described crimes above. It would be ridiculous to assume that such persons of influence would donate an amount that for most people on this planet equals their yearly income as employees at some of the very corporations that are having their delegations at the Bilderberg conferences congregate in secret. Although the donations are registered as such it is appropriate to claim that these funds are actually investments in business and political relations that are envisaged to benefit solely the donors and in no way any member of the general public (citizens), again proving that the Bilderberg Meetings are not of a charitable nature at all since the conferences do not benefit society, not as a whole, not on any local level and certainly not on any national level in any country of the world, although that is precisely what any charitable organization is expected to do. A charitable organization is not expected to compensate wealthy and powerful people – apparatchiks, politicians, heads of state and corporate tycoons – who use their very charity organizations to conspire against the people and to form a corporative global governance cartel with the aim to strengthen their immunity from prosecutions in any court of law.

In 2013 it was reported that the UK Charity Commission had received a filed complaint about the charitable status of the Bilderberg Association. The complaint stated that the Bilderberg Association’s charitable objectives would be “highly unlikely” to qualify for charitable status. The complaint argued that as Bilderberg meetings are entirely secret they have no role at all in public education. “Meetings are not in fact disseminated, and no reports are published. Bilderberg meetings are in fact, by their own admission, characterised by ultimate secrecy. Therefore, it would appear that the objectives and activities of the Bilderberg Association are identifiably false and misleading.”

No annual accounts are published for The Bilderberg Association at the UK Charity Commission, prior to 2011, although The Bilderberg Association is registered since January 24, 1977.

bilderberg association, annual account, charity,united kngdom, registration, charity commission

bilderberg association, annual account, charity,united kngdom, registration, charity commission

The bank that facilitates The Bilderberg Asoociation’s finances is… Barclays Bank London. The Bilderberg Association’s Management Committee member Marcus Agius is a former chairman of Barclays Bank London (2006 to 2012). Although Agius had resigned in 2012 at Barclays, following the Libor inter-bank lending rate scandal, he still was on their payroll until March 2014.

The Bilderberg Association, according to their own annual accounts, is registered at the same address as Simon Robertson Associates LLP (2 St James Place, London, SW1A 1NP). Simon Robertson is a former Goldman Sachs dealmaker and current deputy chairman of HSBC. Robertson himself is also a Bilderberg conference attendee, just like another HSBC executive Douglas Flint. As we all should know, HSBC is involved in laundering at least 880 billion dollars in drug money, yet they came away with a fine of merely $1.2 billion, due to the very nature, profile and influence of these Bilderberg attendees and members.

As you can witness for yourself, those claiming to improve the world and society, the Bilderberg “charities” and the annual conference attendees, are involved in the biggest scandals and fraud cases in modern history. Yet according to most news outlets there’s no news to be gathered at Bilderberg, this can be concluded from the poor, if any, establishment media coverage on the Bilderberg meetings. Still, the media and governments claim that Bilderberg has no influence on sovereignty or world governance, although it has been established beyond any doubt that the very Management Committee of Bilderberg UK is directly linked to the international financial market manipulation practices that directly influence the entire society on this planet. And these people should be left alone when they congregate in secret? What else are they planning there at these conferences?

Where are the real mainstream journalists? Is there really no one who has any guts in the establishment press?

Linking Bilderberg, or rather “Gangsterberg,” directly to the rigging of international financial markets, money laundering for drug cartels and several other serious criminal cases, based on hard facts, now that is news!

C. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

In the US, Bilderberg also has a registered foundation: American Friends of Bilderberg inc.

2001

Directors:

Paul A. Allaire, Marie-Josee Kravis, J. Michael Farren, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller.

Donations:

  • $25,000: David Rockefeller
  • $10,000: Dow Jones Foundation
  • $10,000: Fannie Mae
  • $8,000: Freeport-McMoran Foundation
  • $10,000: Henry Kissinger
  • $50,000: Henry R. Kravis Foundation inc.
  • $25,000: Lucent Technologies
  • $25,000: Marie-Josee Kravis
  • $50,000: Johnson Capital Partners
  • $25,000: The Washington Post Company
  • $25,000: The De Vink Foundation
  • $5,000: The Felix and Elizabeth Rohatyn Foundation
  • $25,000: The Buffalo News
  • $20,000: Wolfensohn Family Foundation
  • $25,000: Xerox Corporation
  • $15,000: IBM International Foundation
  • $1,000: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  • $1,000: Economic Strategy Institute
  • $7,000: Kissinger Foundation
  • $200: Laura Tyson
  • $25,000: Donald E. Graham
  • $1,000: Mr. & Ms. William J. McDonough
  • $1,000: Martin S. & Kathleen F. Feldstein
  • $1,000: Thomas E. Donilon & Catherine Russell

2002

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller.

Donations:

  • $1,000: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  • $25,000: David Rockefeller
  • $25,000: Johnson Family Fund
  • $20,000: Steven Rattner & P. Maureen White Fnd.
  • $1,000: Economic Strategy Institute
  • $25,000: G. Richard Toman
  • $16,000: Freeport-McMoran Foundation
  • $17,000: Henry Kissinger
  • $10,000: Jan Leschly
  • $7,500: IBM International Foundation
  • $$50,000: Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
  • $20,000: Sara Lee Corporation
  • $10,000: Quandrangle Group LLC
  • $25,000: Lucent Technologies
  • $25,000: Marie-Josee Kravis
  • $1,000: Martin S. & Kathleen F. Feldstein
  • $1,000: Mr. & Ms. William J. McDonough
  • $25,000: The De Vink Foundation
  • $5,000: The Felix and Elizabeth Rohatyn Foundation
  • $25,000: The Washington Post Company
  • $1,000: Thomas E. Donilon & Catherine Russell
  • $20,000: Wolfensohn Family Foundation
  • $25,000: Xerox Corporation

2004

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller.

Donations:

  • $15,000: Marie-Josee Kravis
  • $25,000: Henry A. Kissinger
  • $75,000: Ripplewood Holdings LLC
  • $25,000: David Rockefeller
  • $25,000: The Thornton Foundation

2005

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Thomas E. Donilon, Vernon E. Jordan Jr., Richard N. Perle, James D. Wolfensohn.

Donations:

  • $25,000: The Washington Post Company

2006

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Thomas E. Donilon, Vernon E. Jordan Jr., Richard N. Perle, James D. Wolfensohn.

Donations:

  • $25,000: Henry Kissinger
  • $50,000: David Rockefeller
  • $17,500: Freeport-McMoran Foundation

2007

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Thomas E. Donilon, Vernon E. Jordan Jr., Richard N. Perle, James D. Wolfensohn.

Donations:

  • $10,000: Freeport-McMoran Foundation

2008

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Vernon E. Jordan Jr., Richard N. Perle, James D. Wolfensohn.

Donations:

  • $20,000: Henry Kissinger
  • $50,000: David Rockefeller
  • $10,000: Freeport-McMoran Foundation
  • $75,000: Microsoft Corporation
  • $50,000: Marie-Josee & Henry R. Kravis Fnd.
  • $25,000: The Jennie Zoline Foundation
  • $25,000: Wolfensohn Family Foundation
  • $75,000: Peter Thiel
  • $25,000: Johnson Family Fund
  • $75,000: Big Hen Group LLC
  • $25,000: Altman/Kazickas Foundation
  • $25,000: The Washington Post Company
  • $75,000: The Ripplewood Foundation inc.
  • $25,000: Goldman Sachs & Co
  • $25,000: Lazard Freres & Co LLC
  • $25,000: RW Sant Revocable Trust
  • $10,000: The Coca Cola Company
  • $5,000: William S. Paley Foundation

2009

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Vernon E. Jordan Jr., Richard N. Perle, James D. Wolfensohn, Roger C. Altman.

Donations:

  • $10,000: Henry Kissinger
  • $10,000: Freeport-McMoran Foundation
  • $15,000: Marie-Josee & Henry R. Kravis Fnd.
  • $25,000: The Washington Post Company
  • $15,000: The Ripplewood Foundation inc
  • $25,000: Goldman Sachs & Co
  • $15,000: Marie-Josee Kravis
  • $15,000: James A. Johnson

2010

Directors:

Klaus Kleinfeld, James D. Wolfensohn, Roger C. Altman, Vernon E. Jordan Jr., Richard N. Perle, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Jessica T. Mathews, James A. Johnson, Marie-Josee Kravis.

Donations:

  • $25,000: Botwinick-Wolfensohn Foundation
  • $25,000: Donald Graham
  • $50,000: Peter Thiel
  • $50,000: Marie Josee Henry R. Kravis Fnd
  • $10,000: Freeport-McMoran Foundation
  • $25,000: David Rockefeller
  • $10,000: Henry Kissinger

2011

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, Klaus Kleinfeld, Roger C. Altman, Peter Thiel, Richard N. Perle, Craig J. Mundie.

Donations:

  • $25,000: James D. Wolfensohn
  • $25,000: Marie-Josee Kravis
  • $25,000: Marie Josee Henry R. Kravis Fnd
  • $50,000: Microsoft Corporation
  • $7,500: Henry Kissinger

2012

Directors:

Marie-Josee Kravis, James A. Johnson, Jessica T. Mathews, Henry Kissinger, Klaus Kleinfeld, Roger C. Altman, Peter Thiel, Richard N. Perle, Craig J. Mundie.

Donations:

  • $25,000: Dow Chemical
  • $100,000: Alcoa inc.
  • $25,000: Jerry I. Speyer
  • $25,000: Michael Evans
  • $25,000: Steven Rattner
  • $100,000: Timothy Collins
  • $15,000: James A. Johnson
  • $40,000: Marie-Josee Kravis
  • $75,000: Lazard Freres Co LLC
  • $100,000: Altman/Kazickas Foundation
  • $100,000: Peter Thiel
  • $25,000: Wolfensohn Family Foundation
  • $100,000: Marie Josee Henry R. Kravis Fnd
  • $100,000: David Rockefeller

CHAPTER II

CHATHAM HOUSE RULE

Officially the Bilderberg Meetings (a.k.a. Bilderberg Group) describes its private organization as:

  • “Founded in 1954, Bilderberg is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between 120-150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; one third from politics and government and the rest from other fields. The conference is a forum for informal discussions about megatrends and major issues facing the world. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor of any other participant may be revealed. Thanks to the private nature of the conference, the participants are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights. There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.”

In its own profiling, Bilderberg states to be holding their meetings “under the Chatham House Rule” to improve the openness of its conferences, although only in a very limited number of occasions are their conferences actually held in the British Commonwealth.

Furthermore, Bilderberg applies the Chatham House Rule selectively, only where it deems to be needing protective measures, in relation to their meetings and conferences and the secretive nature of the organization and its true intentions and practices. The Chatham House Rule specifically states that “the list of attendees should not be circulated beyond those participating in the meeting,” which Bilderberg does given the fact that they, since recently, even publish the list of attendees on their very own website. Thus, Bilderberg willingly violates the very rules it claims to implement for its conferences. Thus, the value, the protection and the attribution of the Chatham House Rule and the Chatham House Rule itself in relation to the Bilderberg conferences do not apply. Thus, the Chatham House Rule is completely ineffective (void) in relation to Bilderberg as an organization and their meetings and conferences, even when the conferences and meetings are held on British Commonwealth soil.


 CHAPTER III

CORPORATIVE WORLD GOVERNANCE AND DOMINATION

As established in Chapter I, the annual closed meetings organized by the Bilderberg Meetings are not protected in any way by the Chatham House Rule. They can’t be and they shouldn’t be, more so because of the status and profile of at least a third of the attendees who are politicians, members of government and heads of state. This third of the attendees are elected or appointed public representatives of the people in their respective countries. By attending the Bilderberg conferences behind closed doors, thus without access for the public, and without producing any public statements on the actual specific details of the conferences, this third of the attendees knowingly congregates in closed meetings where they consume the information and where they receive national and international policy directions as provided by the steering committee of the Bilderberg Meetings. The theme and topics and the selection of the attendees of each conference are determined by the steering committee, chaired by the chairman. Thus, it is indeed the steering committee who sets the agenda, it is the steering committee that decides what the conferences will be about. Obviously, and this requires no imagination at all, the steering committee knows in advance in which position and with which opinion the attendees in general will leave the conferences upon conclusion thereof because the steering committee and management committee carefully but surely dominates the direction and tone of the presentations and discussions. The steering committee certainly makes sure that all attendees go back to their respective countries and places of residence and business or occupation with the same, similar, agenda in mind, as was discussed, or better, as was received and agreed upon at the conferences.

It is known from statements by several attendees and steering committee members that the meetings are focused on influencing global and regional issues. Although a Bilderberg meeting is described as a forum, the fact is that the core content of such a meeting is scripted, as is the outcome. It is the very nature and essence of the Bilderberg meetings to have the attendees “on the same page” on the preplanned topics of the agenda.

Furthermore, it is also known from statements by several attendees and steering committee members that the Bilderberg meetings are venues where effective policies and measures are handed over to the attendees who are expected to implement those policies and measures locally and nationally – in the “environments” of the attendees – where they operate, do business or run public offices.

Multiple decisions for effective changes of and in society worldwide – for the worse – have already been distributed at the Bilderberg meetings after which they were also effectively implemented on the national, regional and international level. This is a fact.

As a result of this it is fair and just to conclude that this specific third of the attendees – politicians, members of government and heads of state – willingly conspire with their foreign counterparts outside of the national democratic system, or other form of government, of their respective nation. Thus, without any (electoral) interference of the local, national citizens have there been and are there being policies implemented that were/are received and agreed upon behind closed doors, in private. This is not only a hallmark of a cartel that is conspiring it is outright illegal in relation to all national laws be it in a democratic or any other system.

On top of this all, the taxpayers of the countries of this specific third of the attendees – politicians, members of government and heads of state – are ordered to pay for the expenses of this specific third of the attendees their participation in the Bilderberg meetings. Also this is a fact. Citizens are not being given any (electoral) opportunity to reject the by these attendees outside of the government system received and agreed upon policies and they are required to pay for it as well. With what other word than “dictatorial” can such practices be defined without understating the true nature?

The other attendees, the other two-thirds, come from “other fields.” A huge chunk of these attendees are corporate delegations. The remaining are professionally occupied with education and the steering of public opinion (mainstream media).

Where the politicians and heads of state get (foreign) political support and benefits for their implementation of the scripted policies and measures, received and agreed upon at the Bilderberg meetings, the other attendees get economic/political foreknowledge and political/diplomatic/economic protection from the attending politicians and heads of state. In return the attendees in the corporate, pedagogical and media sectors also take favorable positions towards the political attendees and their entourages and towards the common scripted agenda that was set by Bilderberg and was received during the Bilderberg conferences.

This enables an external private organization, the Bilderberg Meetings, to successfully implement a specific world vision and agenda in every corner of the world. This is how corporative world governance is practiced. This is how a corporative global cartel operates and is further being expanded. It is gradual and it works like magic for the Bilderberg steering committee and those who influence Bilderberg itself because Bilderberg is, in relation to the power structure of which it is a part, only a corporative governance wholesale hub where the scripted legislative directions and economic policies are being distributed to those who have the most influence on national and regional level and to those who have been successfully preconditioned in order to enable proper implementation of the scripted agenda.

Many (former) attendees of the Bilderberg meetings were/are also members of the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and of course the global banking cartel. It are eventually the latter three who mainly dictate the Bilderberg Meetings’ conference themes and topics. Although the Bilderberg meetings allow for discussion there’s actually little space left for actual debate and input since the outcome is set from the start.

Strong influence on the agenda of the Bilderberg Meetings also comes from the Club of Rome, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Rothschild foundations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and several “think tanks.” Beyond this point influence also comes from undisclosed interests which then brings us to people who are even more shrouded in secrecy than this surrounding the Bilderberg Meetings and their “charitable foundations.”

Over the years, the number of effective implementations and executions of the Bilderberg Meetings agendas have become too great, and continues to increase, to further credibly  deny that Bilderberg indeed is a powerful instrument that furthers the corporative world governance cartel’s control over the international financial and monetary systems, the general public opinion and sentiment and the social fabric as a whole including the sovereignty of nations. It is striking, to say the least, that this corporative governance wholesale hub effectively helps to secure positions of power in society for the same corporate and political clans, time and again, while constantly managing to stay out of reach of law enforcement and justice departments, even though the very core and other members of this corporative governance wholesale hub – “Gangsterberg” – are proven to be beyond entangled in criminal cases of such nature that should it concern common citizens they would have already been sentenced, imprisoned for 10-to-life and relieved of all their assets and civil rights. If this is not sufficient proof to establish that an extremely poweful corporative cartel exists, as described and named above, that is being put above the laws then nothing ever will.

It is only since the power of the internet was discovered by concerned citizens and activists from around the world that a bright, lasting, spotlight was put on Bilderberg and its meetings, a development that the steering committee admittedly hates. In stark contrast, the establishment media continues to pretend that there’s no real news to be gathered at the Bilderberg conferences, although there are enough juicy topics to be covered and plenty of hard questions to be asked before, during and after every annual Bilderberg conference. When there wouldn’t be any value in finding out what the secrecy surrounding Bilderberg is all about then one can rightfully ask himself what the real value is of knowing what hat the British queen is wearing or who it was that framed Roger Rabbit.

The main and continuing trend, aside from a few exceptions from time to time in more than 60 years (Bilderberg concept since 1952, 62nd conference in 2014),  that the establishment media is following to widely ignore the Bilderberg Meetings, is in line with the very purpose of Bilderberg. Both Bilderberg and the establishment media are important players in keeping up official narratives that contradict the factual reality. This is a fact and this is certainly the case for subjects like 9/11 (USA, 2001), 3/11 (Japan, 2011), man made global warming, the European Union (federation) construct, the war on terror, the financial “crisis” and overpopulation. These are all known fabled realities in that they share the common principle, i.e that the official narratives surrounding them are fabricated, based on lies, on purpose and completely contradict the actual facts and science.

Before continuing to the rest of the evidence, documentation and indications we invite you to review the first exhibit which outlines and details the corporate power structure as it was perceived in 1988.

In many ways many people will experience a feeling of déjà vu, even when they never saw the video material. In many ways, certainly in relation to the economic content, the interview may as well have been aired yesterday as brand new. The similarities with today’s “crisis” are striking and when one considers that this video material was recorded in 1988 one doesn’t need a whole lot of imagination to know how far the discussed projections have already been implemented to a great extend, how much of the projections have already become known facts and reality.


EXHIBITS

  • TP61: Jessica T. Mathews refers to the events in Benghazi (Ambassador Stevens and the CIA villa) as a “fake scandal” but the events are not fake in the sense that she refers to it. It is documented that the Benghazi episode is a “back flipping retard stupid propaganda fail” [1, 2]

 CHAPTER IV

DAMAGE CONTROL AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

(Added May 26, 2014)

An important additional chapter, Chapter 4, needs to be added to case “SITHHC/000-003.” This chapter will focus on and outline how Bilderberg since recently hired a professional team for the purposes of strategic communications, reputation management, crisis counseling, branding and public affairs. Bilderberg has decided to do so due to the rising pressure coming from the general public that is exposing the actual nature of “Gangsterberg.”

As we have learned from The Guardian journalist Charlie Skelton, exhibit TP101, Bilderberg Meetings is hiring the German company CNC (Communications & Network Consulting), since 2013, to improve the public image of Bilderberg, although it is too late for such damage control measures because an increasing number of people will eventually find out anyway what the true nature is of Bilderberg behind the polished mask.

The crucial part to know about CNC is that it is a subsidiary of the French company Publicis Groupe. This is documented also by Reuters in their July 11, 2012, article “Publicis Groupe Acquires CNC, German-Based Strategic Consultancy Network with Global Footprint Will Align to MSLGROUP.” Publicis Groupe profiles itself as, according to information on their own website, the “3rd largest communications group worldwide, leader in digital and interactive communication. With activities spanning 108 countries on five continents, Publicis Groupe employs approximately 62,000 professionals.”

There is a specific reason why Bilderberg has been hiring CNC, through Publicis Groupe, to polish their rightfully smirched public image. One simple glance at Publicis Groupe’s corporate governance webpage shows that a very familiar name suddenly pops up and catches one’s attention: Marie-Josée Kravis. Kravis is a regular Bilderberg conference attendee and she, also through her and her husband’s fund, has already donated a substantial amount of money to American Friends of Bilderberg inc.

Marie-Josee Kravis: $145,000

Marie Josee & Henry R. Kravis Fnd.: $290,000

Marie-Josee Kravis has been a board member, a director, of American Friends of Bilderberg inc. at least from 2001 to 2012.

At Publicis Groupe, Marie-Josée Kravis is a member of the supervisory board, certainly an influential position within the Publicis Groupe company that would allow her to steer the course of Bilderberg’s PR campaigns and likely at a very “competitive” price as well as one can easily imagine. Also on the supervisory board of Publicis Groupe and (former) Bilderberg attendees are Gérard Worms (vice chairman of Rothschild Europe and senior advisor of Rothschild & Cie.), Véronique Morali (president of Fimalac Développement, chair of Webedia, vice-chair of Fitch Group, member of the board of Compagnie Financière Edmond de Rothschild and Coca-Cola Entreprise).

On the management board of Publicis Groupe and a Bilderberg attendee is also Maurice Lévy (chairman of International Board of Governors).

It is obvious that with Marie-Josée Kravis (entangled in “black payments” at Hollinger) and the several other “Bilderbergers” at the head of Publicis Groupe, Bilderberg has again specifically opted to deploy one of their own power houses to keep the circuit firmly closed. Also for its PR facelift Bilderberg comes full circle, by simultaneously expanding the corporative global governance cartel’s wealth (through PR business contracts with Publicis Groupe) and keeping everything inn-house.

Deploying an external company where Bilderberg would have no influence or positions of power would be the least one should expect from the Bilderberg Meetings if they were truly searching for transparency. It would give their PR campaign at least the superficial appearance of being real and sincere. But then again, what Bilderberg doesn’t control it simply excludes. This once again proves that the Bilderberg Meetings always close the cartel ranks and that they truly are a corporative governance wholesale hub.